Morrison’s shallow talent pool

We can’t trust this Government to ‘do its job’

Once upon a time in Australia, we had a system of government where we held regular elections, and the best and the brightest presented themselves for selection. Many had already had glittering careers elsewhere, and were ready to give something back to the Commonwealth. Some were from less elevated walks of life, but they were filled with a fervour to ‘do good’.

As a general rule, upon election, it usually took them some time to show what they were made of, and gradually those with the best minds, and the greatest capacity, worked their way up through the ranks. In political life that has always meant attaining ministerial appointment. If one was unfortunate enough to be seated on the ‘wrong’ side of the chamber, one gained shadow ministerial experience.

Often the Minister, and his or her shadow, continued in the same portfolio, over a period of years. In this way each became expert in the area covered by the job. For example, when the Government was changed by the electorate, the Shadow Minister was able to step into the ministerial role almost seamlessly, and often with shared goals. That approach was known as bi-partisanship.

This served to illustrate the maxim that the Cabinet is there to serve the country, rather than the party. In the best of times the Minister and his or her shadow were able to work together, with the goal of achieving improvement, for the country as a whole. This really came to an end with the Howard Government.

How did Howard change things?

To many Australians John Howard was known as honest, earnest and relatively harmless. But that persona was carefully crafted. His Government was described as ‘mean and tricky’ in a report Howard commissioned, from the Liberals’ own president, Shane Stone. Howard was on a mission in 1996 to re-make Australia, into a faux Thatcherite society, and he used the oldest trick in the book – a ‘budget emergency’.

Serving as a beacon to Tony Abbott in 2013, Howard ‘manufactured’ a budget emergency, and embarked on a ruthless project to rid his Government of debt, by imposing strict savings on reluctant Ministers, and selling off the country’s silver.

Some of the more notable pieces of silver were the sale of Telstra, and the privatisation of both the Commonwealth Employment Service, and the Aged Care sector. The damage these own goals have caused, has cascaded throughout the years, and continues to cause the country to bleed.

This served Howard in two ways. Firstly he engineered “cabinet solidarity” on solving the ’emergency’, thus mandating even unreasonable savings, and he isolated the so-called ‘wets’, many of whom fought for their portfolios’ funding.

‘Wets’ was another term for moderates, who generally believed in a type of humanistic Conservatism, where they achieved economic goals, while protecting the poor. Some of his best performers were either sidetracked, or actively removed from the parliament, through selective organisational targeting.

The party is of course now stacked with time-serving, narrow, ideologically motivated drones, whose life experience is usually having served as an ‘adviser’ to a parliamentarian hack, or as a lawyer. That does not deepen the gene pool, but it does provide malleable cattle with which to work.

What happened to bi-partisanship?

Cabinet ministers are now chosen on the basis of loyalty to whomever is sitting in the prime ministerial chair. Talent is in such short supply that someone like Michaelia Cash, a former lawyer, is now a cabinet minister. Her portfolio area is Employment, Skills, Small and Family Business. With her unreasoning loathing for all things union, who could she work with, across the aisle? And working at a major law firm, as a taster for small business?

Angus Taylor is a former Rhodes Scholar, and he has worked as a management consultant for twenty years or so. He must know about risk management, or he would not have been employed in management consulting. And yet, in possibly the most important role he will ever be employed in, that of reducing Australia’s emissions in a pre-apocalyptic world, he adheres to the anti-science rhetoric, and apparent obfuscations of a global heating denialist. The only possible explanation for his behaviour is that he is unable to read a risk profile, or he cannot escape the shackles of his denialism.

The Hon Melissa Price MP was Vice President of Legal and Business Development for Crosslands Resources, an iron ore miner, before she was appointed to the Environment Ministry. As Peter Fitzsimons asked on television, “If a million dead fish at Menindee doesn’t attract your attention as the environment minister, what does it take?”

She also approved the Adani Mine’s groundwater plan just days before the 2019 election, although the plan was riddled with errors. It puts her in line to contest the Worst Environment Minister in History Award, with Greg Hunt and Josh Frydenberg also in the running.

Was the Prime Minister joking with these appointments?

One theme runs through this tiny sample of ministerial misfits. It can be read as being the best we can do, with a shallow pool to pick from, or did Morrison actually choose ministers who would so underperform that he could show his contempt for the very areas they represent.

Considering the IPA obsession for small, to no government, could this be, like Trump’s, a new low in ministerial commitment, as we head to low-to-no regulation, and really ugly capitalism?

Politics has been called, unkindly, show business for ugly people, but it should not be taken so lightly. Politics is a deadly serious undertaking, because it has real, tangible consequences. That is why it constantly surprises me that politicians think that they have some form of pass, that they will not be judged for their actions. Because their decisions often have real-world consequences.

2 comments

  1. Howard was a loathsome creature invented by the Liberal Party to inflict as much harm as possible. The liberal brains trust never thought they would get the mileage out of the little turd that they did. Each subsequent re-election they ramped up the pain inflicted on the Australian people and like the good sheep we are, copped it all.
    The warning signs of gross ineptitude have been there for a long long time, it is only now we are scraping the bottom of the talent barrel, again, that a very few people are asking questions.
    One question worth posing to the liberal and national party voters is: Why?
    Why would you vote for such ineptitude? If the answer comes back that the labor party aren’t much better then we have a decision to make.
    This two party dominance of Australian politics has run its course.
    Time to heave all of them out and start again.
    There are massively significant global issues we must attend to and both these political parties are compromised by their backers and damaging promises they made to foreign governments.
    They are no further use in this changing world.
    Let us not forget, as has been pointed out above, our system of government has been changed to favour loyalty to a political party and good government taken away from the Australian people.
    The Liberal Party is a small select group of capitalists bent on subverting the world in their favour, theirs is no morality tale simply a greedy lust for wealth and influence.
    Their woeful decision making, graft, corruption, unaccountability, lying, cheating, protecting their bully boys and using cabinet as a repository for the severely useless should make us fearful for the future.
    Life altering decisions about coal and gas need to be made now.
    Plans urgently need to be put in place now to offset the decades of abusive inaction on the part of the liberal party.
    So much has to happen immediately and if we continue on as we are then we are all rooted.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. “Politics is a deadly serious undertaking, because it has real, tangible consequences. That is why it constantly surprises me that politicians think that they have some form of pass, that they will not be judged for their actions.”

    While no doubt politics has real, tangible consequence, the problem with that statement, Mark, is that politicians no longer face any consequences for their actions. It used to be that politicians making poor decisions would be voted out at the next election. Howard lost so many ministers to scandal in the first couple of years that he changed his response from condemnation to accommodation of misbehaviour.

    Led by the awful Scott Morrison, they are now all protected from such electoral consequences.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.